體驗區

免費試讀請先加入會員並下載瀏覽軟體

詳目顯示
        閱讀
篇名 父母管教方式、誠實教育與幼兒欺騙行為之相關研究
並列篇名 Relationship Between Parenting Style, Honesty Education, and Children’s Deception
作者 侯宜寧(I-Ning Hou) 、翟敏如(Min-Ju Tsai)
中文摘要 本研究主旨在探討父母管教方式、誠實教育與幼兒欺騙行為之相關研究。採用問卷調查法,以臺南市某間公立國小附設幼兒園之幼兒及幼兒父母為研究對象,共85位大班生幼兒及其父母作為本研究之受試者。本研究採用工具有「利用欺騙情境測驗幼兒之欺騙行為」、「父母管教方式量表」、「父母誠實教育量表」。以描述性統計、t檢定、變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關、多元迴歸分析等統計方法進行分析,研究結果如下:一、父母教育程度為高中職及專科(含)以下之幼兒的欺騙行為顯著高於大學(含)以上之幼兒。二、不同職業父母之幼兒的欺騙行為沒有顯著差異。三、在對幼兒欺騙行為的迴歸分析上,「獨斷專權型」的預測力最大,且為正向預測;其他具有顯著預測力的變項依序為「民主威信型」和「誠實教育方式」,為負向預測。
英文摘要 This study investigated the relationship between parenting styles, honesty education, and deceptive behavior in children. In total, 85 children from a public preschool in Tainan and their parents were the targets of this study. Children’s deceptive behavior was observed under testing conditions. The Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire and a parental honesty education measurement scale were also employed. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, the t test, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson’s correlation, and regression. The results were as follows: Children whose parents completed high school or vocational education exhibited significantly more deceptive behavior than did those whose parents attended university. No significant difference effect was observed for parental occupations on children’s deceptive behavior. Regression analysis indicated that the authoritarian parenting style was the most predictive variable and was a positive predictor of deceptive behavior. Other significant predictive variables were authoritative parenting style and honesty education methods, which were negative predictors.
頁次 001-023
關鍵詞 欺騙行為 誠實教育 父母管教方式 Deception Honesty education Parenting style
卷期 23
日期 202101
刊名 幼兒教保研究期刊
出版單位 國立嘉義大學幼兒教育系