體驗區
|
| 篇名 |
大学排名话语的理论支柱、偏见及后果
|
| 並列篇名 |
The oretical Underpinnings 9 Biases 9 and Consequences of the University Ranking Discourse
|
| 作者 |
乌利里希•泰希勒(Ulrich Teichler)
|
| 中文摘要 |
大学排名是世纪之交以来世界高等教育政策争论的热门话题。主流的 大学排行榜有七个共同的理论支柱，如强调顶尖大学的重要性、强调多元化高等教育 体系中纵向差异的重要性等等；还有八大排名误区，可概括为过于强调研究的主导地 位、忽视高等教育的“第三使命”、低估高等教育的影响力、缺乏对高等教育适切性的测 量等等。大学排名驱动了高等教育体系的变革，但很难说它完全取得了成功，必须继 续思考其流行原因和探寻可能的替代性方案。
|
| 英文摘要 |
Rankings is a major issue of higher education policy debates worldwide since around the turn of the century. The mainstream of rankings is based on common seven theoretical underpinnings, such as emphasizing the importance of the top and vertical distinctions in a steeply diversified system. Eight data-related rationales of rankings can be named including the dominance of research, neglect of the “Third Mission” of higher education，low regard for the impact of higher education, scarcity of measures of relevance, and so on. University ranking has driven the reform of national higher education systems, but it is difficult to say that it has been completely successful. We must continue to think about its popularity and possible alternatives.
|
| 頁次 |
083-096
|
| 關鍵詞 |
大学排名
、理论支柱
、偏见
、后果
、CSSCI
|
| 卷期 |
20:2
|
| 日期 |
202204
|
| 刊名 |
北京大學教育評論
|
| 出版單位 |
北京大學
|
| DOI |
10. 12088/pkul671-9468. 202202006
|
|
相關文獻 :
客服信箱