體驗區

免費試讀請先加入會員並下載瀏覽軟體

詳目顯示
        閱讀
篇名 立足“教育”抑或立足“劳动”?——对两种通行劳动教育观的审思
並列篇名 Based on “Education” or “Labor”: Reflection on Two General Concepts of Labor Education
作者 张应强(Zhang Yingqiang) 、唐宇聪(Tang Yucong)
中文摘要 长期以来,我国教育学界主要立足教育来研究劳动和劳动教育,形成了两种通行的劳动教育观。这两种通行的劳动教育观都存在方法论缺陷:一是劳动与教育本末倒置;二是忽视了劳动和劳动教育对社会主义教育的全面规定性;三是对“全面发展教育理论”存在片面理解;四是忽视了劳动和劳动教育与中华优秀文化和教育传统的有机联系。“劳动”是一个体现了鲜明的马克思主义意识形态和中华优秀文化传统精神的范畴,必须以马克思主义劳动观为指导,既要立足教育来研究劳动和劳动教育,更要立足劳动来研究教育和劳动教育,实现劳动教育研究方法论的根本转变。
英文摘要 For a long time, the educational community in China has studied labor and labor education mainly based on education, thus forming two general concepts on labor and labor education. Both of these general concepts on labor and labor education have methodological flaws: firstly, it reverses the relationship between labor and education. Secondly, it overlooks the comprehensive regulation of labor and labor education on Socialist Education. Thirdly, there is a one-sided understanding of the “comprehensive development education theory”. Fourthly, it overlooks the organic connection between labor and excellent Chinese cultural traditions. “Labor” is a category that embodies the distinct Marxist ideology and the spirit of excellent traditional Chinese culture. We must be guided by Marxist labor concept, to achieve a fundamental transformation in the research methodology of labor education, and should not only study labor and labor education based on education, but also based on labor to study education and labor education.
頁次 038-050
關鍵詞 劳动教育 党的教育方针 人工智能时代 马克思主义劳动观 labor education the educational policy of the CPC the age of artificial intelligence Marxist labor concept CSSCI
卷期 42:6
日期 202406
刊名 華東師範大學學報(教育科學版)
出版單位 華東師範大學
DOI 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2024.06.004