體驗區
|
| 篇名 |
以運動標籤建構真實融合的婚姻與家庭：兩位感官障礙父親突破假性融合之歷程探究
|
| 並列篇名 |
Using sport labeling to construct true inclusion in marriage and family: Exploring the process of overcoming superficial inclusion for two fathers with sensory disabilities
|
| 作者 |
徐一騰(Yi-Teng Hsu)
、葉翰霖(Han-Lin Yeh)
、姜義村(I-Tsun Chiang)
|
| 中文摘要 |
聯合國身心障礙者權利公約（CRPD）指出國家應消除歧視，保障身心障礙者於愛情、婚姻家庭組成及其親職角色等權利，身心障礙者由於自身因素與社會多元交織壓迫之限制，很大程度從搖籃到墳墓伴隨著負面標籤，而國際間對於人權之重視，是近年推動身心障礙者權益的重要發展，其社會融合品質更是其中重要關鍵。然而，檢視國內社會融合推展仍有假性融合之挑戰，因此有意義的真實融合現象如婚姻與運動參與情境，及其標籤調適之情形值得進一步探究。本研究奠基於紮根理論，以多元資料蒐集方式深入瞭解兩位育有子女之感官障礙父親之生命經驗，並與相關文獻進行對話和修正。根據研究結果之發現，建立「假性融合沙洲理論」，感官障礙父親自「邁向社會融合之河」起始，在不同障礙特質與環境條件下熟悉自身障礙，通過運動參與、接納障礙和勇敢追愛等正面標籤，調適自我對於障礙之認同，通過「假性融合潟湖」之調節以及「假性融合沙洲」之阻礙，啟動正向人生導航系統，更進一步在前往「真實融合海洋」的旅程中發現，規律運動習慣、父母支持、真實之家庭衝突，以及勇敢追愛並打破隨障礙而來之刻板印象，如在婚姻中翻轉成為神隊友等特徵均是關鍵要素。綜合歸納以下結論：一、運動帶來的正向標籤有助於身心障礙者的真實融合；二、假性融合沙洲之利弊自覺；三、融合海洋中婚姻與家庭展現真實融合的樣貌。依據本研究建議延伸對於非主流價值觀認可之婚姻與家庭，探索強化正面標籤與真實融合的關鍵，建立多元典範家庭並鼓勵不同面貌的家庭模式共融於社會。
|
| 英文摘要 |
Rationale & Purpose: The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities states that eliminating discrimination against persons with disabilities in all matters relating to marriage, family, parenthood, and relationships is crucial to ensuring meaningful inclusion. The rights of people with disabilities are being re-emphasized with the aim of further ensuring the meaningful inclusion of such individuals; social exclusion can originate from stigma, which people with disabilities often face. In many cultures, deeply ingrained stereotypes and prejudices prevail, and people with disabilities are a particularly stigmatized group. People with disabilities are often viewed through a lens of bias and discrimination. Consequently, the term “disability” is frequently considered to have a negative connotation and often denotes societal vulnerability, the need for assistance, difficulty living independently, and perceived inability to adapt to social norms. Additionally, hegemonic masculinity fosters the suppression and exclusion of nontraditional masculine behaviors and traits, constraining men’s freedom of expression and personal development. From a disability studies perspective, a rigid gender norm can further marginalize and oppress men with disabilities, meaning that such individuals must field questions about their abilities and worth; doing so negatively affects their physical and mental well-being and their social participation. Researchers have found that successful involvement in sport or in marital and family life are sufficient to adjust the negative labels of individuals with disabilities and enhance their self-identity. Sport and marriage have become two of the pathways through which true social inclusion is promoted for individuals with disabilities. The purpose of this study was to explore the process of label adjustment and construction for male individuals with disabilities in relation to sports involvement and marital experiences. Methods: To gain an in-depth understanding of label adjustment and meaningful inclusion, this study adopted a grounded theory approach and collected data from multiple sources to explore the growth experiences and family situations of two fathers with sensory disabilities. Indepth interviews were conducted with the two participants, one had visual disabilities, and the other had hearing disabilities, and in the analysis of their narratives, the relevant literature was consulted to ensure comprehensiveness. Both participants were married and had two children, who lived with them in their households. The study was conducted in two phases. The first phase involved the collection, analysis, and organization of data. First, public multimedia data were collected. The participants had high public visibility, and this study collected and analyzed data from publicly available Facebook posts, interviews from seven broadcast episodes in a radio program, and 11 YouTube videos posted in the preceding 3 years. Second, participant observation data were collected. The participants were observed during their voluntary involvement in competitive events, such as Ironman triathlons and swimming competitions; in total, the participants participated in 13 events, each spanning approximately 3 days. Approximately 660 hours of observation data were accumulated. Additionally, five public speeches and six training sessions were observed in person, yielding approximately 40 hours of additional observation data on the participants and their spouses. The total observation time was approximately 700 hours. Third, totaling approximately 8,000 words research notes which were done by the research team initiated a 10-month period of observation and reflection after obtaining ethical approval. In the second phase, we conducted in-depth interviews. The process of the in-depth interviews was as follows. Each father and their spouse were interviewed three times; a semi-structured interview outline was employed as a reference and adjusted in accordance with the context. During the COVID-19 pandemic, online interviews were conducted. Each interview lasted approximately 1.5 hours. In total, the interview time for all sessions amounted to approximately 10 hours, and the transcribed text totaled approximately 40,000 words. Given the interconnected nature of marriage, family life, and the social environment, this study focused on the growth context and family life of the two participants as a core foundation and then extended the exploration of their social integration and label adaptation through the interviews. Results: The fathers understood the obstacles they faced, promoted their self-identity, and actively planned their lives by using positive labels, such as sports participation despite with barriers and environmental challenges. This study initially identified three primary experiences through which the participants were able to transcend their disability labels: (1) despite a superficial inclusion school environment, sports participation leading to a transformation of self-identity and self-realization; (2) initiating genuine inclusion opportunities with a sportsmanship spirit—progressing toward marriage and public service; and (3) cultivating advantageous abilities within the context of marriage on the basis of different disability attributes. According to the results, a model entitled the “Theory of the Superficial Inclusion Sandbar” was constructed. Four core categories—The River toward Inclusion (pathway), the Wind of Promoting Inclusion (catalyst), the Superficial Inclusion Lagoon (threats and regulation), and the Superficial Inclusion Sandbar (barriers)—were organized to elucidate the experiences of the participants throughout their life journey. We found that the participants experienced the following processes within the context of this Superficial Inclusion Sandbar theory: (1) they knew and understood that the Superficial Inclusion Sandbar had both advantages and disadvantages; (2) they navigated the societal integration gateway through their participation in sports; and (3) they ultimately reached the same state of genuine inclusion despite the fact that their paths toward the ocean of genuine inclusion began differently. Conclusions & Implications: (1) positive labels derived from sports contribute to the true inclusion of individuals with disabilities; (2) such individuals are aware of the advantages and disadvantages of the Superficial Inclusion Sandbar; and (3) individuals with disabilities can own the portrayal of true inclusion in the context of marriage and family within the ocean of inclusion. This study has several limitations, as follows: (1) the participants had similar characteristics (gender, age, disability, and time of disability onset); (2) the issue of “boundary work” for male individuals with disabilities who are perceived as “failures” by external standards was not addressed; and (3) the data sources were limited. Beginning from the River Toward Social Inclusion, the adjustment of self-identity regarding disabilities through positive labels, such as sports participation, should be based on a values and recognition system centered on individuals with disabilities rather than based on mainstream societal values. This study—the research domains of which were the workplace, sports, marriage, and family—found that career advancement, outstanding performance in sports, maintaining healthy relationships in the marriage and family, and successful parenting experiences can all establish a genuine sense of accomplishment for men with disabilities and construct their self-efficacy, eliminating obstacles that resemble Superficial Inclusion Sandbar—such as low societal expectations, low societal approval, limited understanding of human rights implications, and being tolerated and overlooked—and strengthening the benefits of positive labels obtained through sports participation. This study recommends the extension of research into nonmainstream family structures, strengthening of positive labels and factors contributing to true inclusion, establishment of models, and encouragement of the coexistence of different family patterns in society, with the aim of courageously creating diverse values.
|
| 頁次 |
001-029
|
| 關鍵詞 |
身心障礙
、紮根理論
、運動參與
、標籤
、融合
、disabilities
、inclusion
、label
、sport
、stigma
、TSSCI
|
| 卷期 |
48:3
|
| 日期 |
202311
|
| 刊名 |
特殊教育研究學刊
|
| 出版單位 |
國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系
|
| DOI |
10.6172/BSE.202311_48(3).0001
|
|
相關文獻 :
客服信箱