體驗區

免費試讀請先加入會員並下載瀏覽軟體

詳目顯示
        閱讀
篇名 學習成為高等教育體系中的CLIL教師:以亞洲教師為個案研究
並列篇名 Becoming a Teacher of CLIL in Higher Education: A Pilot Study in Asia
作者 李佳盈(Jia-Ying Lee)
中文摘要 本研究旨在探討高等教育教師學習「學科內容與語言綜合學習法」(content and language integrated learning, CLIL)提升教學的效果。十三位大學在職教師(五位日籍、四位台灣籍、兩位中國籍、一位菲律賓、及一位泰國籍)參與為期兩週的CLIL密集師資訓練課程。課程從引領教師認識CLIL教學理論及原理開始,以實作及試教作為收尾。為評估教師參與學習CLIL教學的成效,研究採用兩份量化問卷及一份半結構質性問卷收集相關資料。研究結果顯示,參與教師普遍認同CLIL教學法,並認為其教學效果(effectiveness)優於教學效益(efficiency)。教師對CLIL教學實踐的信念,受到本身的英語程度及過往的教學經驗影響。參與教師對於CLIL於高等教育現場實踐,從所屬教育文化體系,提出存有的挑戰、困難,與困境。本研究為該領域帶來重要貢獻,其結果得提供高等教育發展CLIL教學之參照、師資培訓機構推動CLIL參考,及有志投入CLIL教學的教師了解CLIL教學法的本質等資訊。
英文摘要 This study explores the developmental course of training to become a content and language integrated learning (CLIL) practitioner in higher education. Thirteen in-service teachers (five Japanese, four Taiwanese, two Chinese, one Filipino, and one Thai) wholly new to the CLIL approach received an intensive fortnight’s training in CLIL. The training, following the CLIL model, started by introducing the theory, rationale and foundations of CLIL and concluded with a mini-CLIL teaching session from each teacher. Two quantitative surveys and a qualitative semi-structured survey yielded data on the trainees’ experiences as course members. The results show that the teachers generally approved of CLIL, endorsing its effectiveness more than its efficiency. The teachers’ self-confidence in English skills and their past teaching experiences seemingly affected their belief in CLIL’s practices. Finally, the teachers revealed some challenges in implementing CLIL in general, in higher education, and in their specific culture-education contexts. The study made important contributions in the field, with its findings serving as valuable references for higher education, teacher-training programs, and interested teachers.
頁次 091-120
關鍵詞 以英語為外語 高等教育 教師訓練 學科內容與語言綜合學習 content and language integrated learning (CLIL) English as an additional Language higher education teacher training TSSCI
卷期 34:1
日期 202106
刊名 教育實踐與研究
出版單位 國立臺北教育大學