體驗區
|
| 篇名 |
國民小學學生書包減重計畫之政策評估
|
| 並列篇名 |
Policy Assessment on the weights of schoolbags for elementary school students and relevant influence factors
|
| 作者 |
蕭佳純(Hsiao,Chia-Chun )
|
| 中文摘要 |
本研究目的為分析學童書包重量、負重率、超重比例、分布情形及影響負重率的 原因，並以不同學校規模之學生共計14,385 位為研究對象，進行為期三次的調查。根 據統計分析結果，本研究得到以下結論：第一，學生書包重量三次調查約為3.25、3.46 及3.25 公斤，負重率分別為0.11、0.12 及0.11。第二，教育部補助置物櫃在低年級班 級的成效良好，擁有置物櫃的合格率較高。第三，影響書包負重率原因有「年級」、「 書 包款式」、「書包內容物」、「家長要求」、「上學方式」、「有無置物櫃」以及「學校規模」。 第四，各縣市書包超重的分布情形，以基隆市與臺北市的合格率最高，彰化縣最低， 而超重比例最嚴重的是嘉義縣，最輕微的則是臺北市。
|
| 英文摘要 |
This study aims to analyze the weights and the burden rate of schoolbags, the proportion and the distribution of overweight, and the factors in the burden rate. Total 14,385 students from different scales schools were exampled as the research subjects for three investigations. Based on the statistical results, several conclusions were made in the study. First, the weights of schoolbags for the three investigations appeared 3.25, 3.46, and 3.25 kilograms, and the burden rates were 0.11, 0.12, and 0.11, respectively. Second, the Ministry of Education subsidizing lockers presented better effect on lower grade classes, which appeared higher qualification rate on lockers. Third, the factors in the burden rate of schoolbags included grade, style of schoolbags, contents in schoolbags, requirements from parents, ways to go to school, provision of lockers, and scale of schools. Fourth, regarding the distribution of overweight, Keelung City and Taipei City presented the highest qualification rate and Changhua County the lowest, while the overweight proportions appeared the worst in Chiayi County and the slightest in Taipei City.
|
| 頁次 |
045-072
|
| 關鍵詞 |
書包重量
、置物櫃
、負重率
、weight of schoolbags
、lockers
、the percentage of loading
|
| 卷期 |
26
|
| 日期 |
201412
|
| 刊名 |
彰化師大教育學報
|
| 出版單位 |
國立彰化師範大學教育研究所
|
|
相關文獻 :
客服信箱