體驗區

免費試讀請先加入會員並下載瀏覽軟體

詳目顯示
        閱讀
篇名 以電腦為媒介同步溝通方式在以英語為外語辯論課程之詞彙密度個案研究
並列篇名 Lexical Density via Synchronous CMC in an EFL Debate Course: A Case Study
作者 平為民(Robert D. Pierce)
中文摘要 本研究著重在分析台灣中部地區一所大學學生在辯論課程中語言輸出的表現是否因不同溝通形式及不同任務而有所不同。學習活動為針對辯論主題代表正反方三組學生在質詢過程中的提問與回答。在三個回合辯論中之兩個回合,由B 學生在實驗室中分別以面對面提問及透過微軟公司所開發之即時通訊軟體(MSN Messenger)為媒介進行提問。在另外兩回合,B 學生皆以電腦為媒介溝通方式進行同步提問或回答。依據語言的複雜度,本研究收集辯論過程中所使用的面對面提問口語語言及透過電腦為媒介溝通方式之書面文字記錄,並進一步分析其總詞彙密度、加權詞彙密度(Halliday, 1989; O‟Loughlin, 2001)及相異詞之比例。儘管研究範圍有限,研究結果顯示在不同的溝通互動形式下,語言複雜度的差異較大;在提問與回答任務中,語言複雜度則差異較小。本研究亦探討影響研究成果的潛在原因。
英文摘要 The present research focuses on the analysis of EFL learner language output in twodifferent formats and two different tasks, for students doing performance in a universityEFL debate class in central Taiwan. The activities involved three pair combinations ofstudents performing questioning and answering in a cross-examination sessionrepresenting opposing sides on a debate topic. Two of the three sessions involve StudentB performing the same task, questioning, but in different formats – in lab face-to-facequestioning and in lab synchronous computer-mediated (CMC) questioning, via MSNMessenger. Another two of the three sessions involved Student B either questioning oranswering, but both in the synchronous CMC format. Transcripts and computer logs werecollected and analyzed in terms of language complexity, using general and weightedlexical density calculation measures (Halliday, 1989; O‟Loughlin, 2001), plus type-tokenratios. Though limited in scope, findings suggested stronger complexity differences basedon interaction formats, but only mild complexity differences based on differences in task.Discussion of potentially influencing variables is provided.
頁次 139-156
關鍵詞 同步電腦中介溝通 辯論論證 語言的複雜性 詞彙密度 synchronous computer mediated communication debate argumentation language complexity lexical density
卷期 7
日期 201007
刊名 SPECTRUM : NCUE Studies in Language, Literature, Translation
出版單位 國立彰化師範大學