體驗區
|
| 篇名 |
「風雲再起，鼓勵成人就讀大學方案」政策調控分析－魯曼社會系統理論觀點的應用
|
| 並列篇名 |
Analysis of Policy Regulation on "START ANEW Adult Higher Education Encouragement Program" – An Application of Social System Theory of Niklas Luhmann
|
| 作者 |
劉幸真
|
| 中文摘要 |
教育部提出「風雲再起，鼓勵成人就讀大學方案」政策，就魯曼社會系統理論的觀點來看，是因應現代複雜的社會環境而提出的政策調控方案；若以系統流動平衡的觀點論之，與其如方案所說的「擴大成人參與回流教育」，倒不如說系統（教育部）給予次系統（私立大學校院）環境與能量。然而，從自我再製系統理論的觀點而言，調控只能是自我調控，政策調控主體―教育部，以及兩個政策調控客體―私立大學校院與成人學生，各有其內部溝通語言。 本研究進一步從二元符碼辯證「風雲再起，鼓勵成人就讀大學方案」的幾個議題，包括：（一）成人學生就讀品質議題透過考試／不考試；（二）私立大學校院的經營本質以捐資興學／投資（機）興學討論；（三）回流教育在高等教育的全時間體制實施，其課程間的「主從」議題藉由成人學生／非成人學生來論述。藉由這三者的論述，並據以對教育部提出建議。
|
| 英文摘要 |
In response to the current complex social situation, the Ministry of Education (MOE) proposed "START ANEW Adult Higher Education Encouragement Program" in 2011, based on Niklas Luhmann's social system theory. The objective of the program – expanding the participation of adult college education – is essentially equivalent to the transfer of environment (resources and energy) from MOE system to sub-system (private collages). However, from the viewpoint of autopoiesis, such regulation is not much more than self-regulation. The Ministry of Education, the policy regulation subject, has different agenda than those of the policy regulation objects – private colleges and adult students. We investigate the adult college education program using the "Binary Codes" methodology. Issues investigated include: 1) Quality of adult education through exam / no-exam; 2) Nature of private collage management through nonprofit / for-profit institutions; 3) Priority in full-time curriculum implementation through traditional / non-traditional students. Recommendations are proposed to the Ministry of Education based on the above dissertation.
|
| 頁次 |
113-137
|
| 關鍵詞 |
大學與成人教育
、自我再製
、回流教育
、社會系統理論
、魯曼
、college & adult education
、autopoiesis
、recurrent education
、social system theory
、Niklas Luhmann
|
| 卷期 |
19
|
| 日期 |
201212
|
| 刊名 |
成人及終身教育學刊
|
| 出版單位 |
中華民國成人教育學會等
|
|
相關文獻 :
客服信箱